@Article{BarbosaSoSaSiBaVi:2022:SyLiRe,
author = "Barbosa, Gerson and Souza, {\'E}rica Ferreira de and Santos,
Luciana Brasil Rebelo dos and Silva, Marlon da and Balera, Juliana
Marino and Vijaykumar, Nandamudi Lankalapalli",
affiliation = "{Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)} and {Universidade
Tecnol{\'o}gica Federal do Paran{\'a} (UTFPR)} and Instituto
Federal de Educa{\c{c}}{\~a}o, Ci{\^e}ncia e Tecnologia de
S{\~a}o Paulo (IFSP) and Instituto Federal de
Educa{\c{c}}{\~a}o, Ci{\^e}ncia e Tecnologia de S{\~a}o Paulo
(IFSP) and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "A Systematic Literature Review on prioritizing software test cases
using Markov chains",
journal = "Information and Software Technology",
year = "2022",
volume = "147",
pages = "e106902",
month = "July",
keywords = "Markov Chains, Systematic Literature Review, Test case
prioritization.",
abstract = "Context: Software Testing is a costly activity since the size of
the test case set tends to increase as the construction of the
software evolves. Test Case Prioritization (TCP) can reduce the
effort and cost of software testing. TCP is an activity where a
subset of the existing test cases is selected in order to maximize
the possibility of finding defects. On the other hand, Markov
Chains representing a reactive system, when solved, can present
the occupation time of each of their states. The idea is to use
such information and associate priority to those test cases that
consist of states with the highest probabilities. Objective: The
objective of this paper is to conduct a survey to identify and
understand key initiatives for using Markov Chains in TCP. Aspects
such as approaches, developed techniques, programming languages,
analytical and simulation results, and validation tests are
investigated. Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was
conducted considering studies published up to July 2021 from five
different databases to answer the three research questions.
Results: From SLR, we identified 480 studies addressing Markov
Chains in TCP that have been reviewed in order to extract relevant
information on a set of research questions. Conclusion: The final
12 studies analyzed use Markov Chains at some stage of test case
prioritization in a distinct way, that is, we found that there is
no strong relationship between any of the studies, not only on how
the technique was used but also in the context of the application.
Concerning the fields of application of this subject, 6 forms of
approach were found: Controlled Markov Chain, Usage Model,
Model-Based Test, Regression Test, Statistical Test, and Random
Test. This demonstrates the versatility and robustness of the
tool. A large part of the studies developed some prioritization
tool, being its validation done in some cases analytically and in
others numerically, such as: Measure of the software
specification, Optimal Test Transition Probabilities, Adaptive
Software Testing, Automatic Prioritization, Ant Colony
Optimization, Model Driven approach, and Monte Carlo Random
Testing.",
doi = "10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106902",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106902",
issn = "0950-5849",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Barbosa_2022.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "20 maio 2024"
}